License

Last modified 2015-03-10.

Private Use

You may use this and/or share it with absolutely anyone if the interaction is regarded private. You may do absolutely anything with it in this case, no matter what it is, regardless of the rest of this page.

Redistribution

You may redistribute this in any way you see fit, in accordance to the CC-BY license.

Commercial Use

You may profit from the information held in this site, but preferably only if it has been heavily modified. In accordance with a CC-BY license, you must provide attribution.

Number theories

There are several different ideas surrounding logic in mathematics.
Here are some of them.

Single Number Logic

This basically states that a thing can only have one answer. For example |x|=2 would normally have two answers, 2 and -2. This theory states that a thing can only be one other thing at one time, as the physical space it takes up wherever it is is not identical to the other answer’s space / position.
Basically this follows the logic that while |x|=2 gives positive and negative 2, positive 2 and negative 2 are not the same, thus cannot fit into the same category (x). X can be -2 or it can be 2, but it cannot be both.

Multiple Number Logic

This ideology states that something will always have many answers. For example x=1. x is 1 and 2-1 and 3-2 and 1/2 + 1/2 infinitely adding combinations. The idea is that 4+4 is not exactly the same as 2+6 simply due to the fact that, as with the above, they have different data, x+y =/= y+x due to its point in time and space, thus they are different answers. This only works in logic, not mathematics due to the fact that all possible operations are completed before the answer is given.

Mathematical or “Simultaneous” Logic

This is base mathematical logic, combining the above ideas. Something can be two things, yet it can only be those two things. |x|=2 gives 2 and -2 but not 2-4 or 1+1. Data has no unique position in time/space as such, instead it is seen ‘when needed’, as if it is dynamic in logic. There is no broad frame of reference as in Multiple Number Logic.

Beginning of Time

There is no beginning to the universe, only constant existence with no start or end point.

Previous Argument

Some have said, (the evident majority) that time at one stage, started. The logic that follows is that anything that exists has been formed in some way in the past.

Present Argument

Humans can only imagine that which either lies in their memory or in genetics. Logic is something contained in memory (seen from the existence surrounding the person and from human base traits). Thus an understanding of something “always” existing is impossible to humans, and can only be labeled as infinite or other.

Reason one.
For something to exist it has to come from something else: there is no creation in the universe but rather modification.
This is a rather weak statement in logic, but as observed and by meta we can determine that it is very unlikely that it is untrue.

Reason two.
Something such as a “beginning” relies on relativity – time. Thus a beginning of time can’t exist as the method for beginnings to exist relies upon time.
“The ball in the box created it when the box contained it” as a metaphor to explain it badly.

Thus something starting without time is impossible, thus time being “started” is also impossible as it would require time.